Monday, April 21, 2008

Earth Flag


The Earth flag is not an official flag, since there is no official governing body over Earth. The flag holds a photo transfer of a NASA image of the Earth on a dark blue background. It has been associated with Earth Day. Although the flag was originally copyrighted, a judge ruled that the copyright was invalid.
Wiki

Earth Day Protest (Manilla)


Greenpeace activists put up a sign after taking water samples to examine pollution levels of Laguna Lake, the country's largest freshwater lake, which is being used as a dump site in Angono, Rizal province south of Manila, Philippines Monday April 21, 2008. To mark the country's Earth Day celebration with water protection as its theme this year, the environmentalist group called the attention of the government for the strict enforcement of waste laws to protect the country's threatened freshwater sources. Laguna Lake is being eyed as a potential source of potable water for metropolitan Manila's more than 11 million people. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)

Thursday, April 17, 2008

World's Biggest Windfarm in Texas


Oil mogul throws caution to the wind

April 18, 2008
SMH

Legendary Texas oil man T Boone Pickens has gone green with a plan to spend $US10 billion ($10.7 billion) to build the world's biggest wind farm. But he's not doing it out of generosity - he expects to turn a buck.

The Southern octogenarian's plans are as big as the Texas prairie, where he lives on a ranch with his horses, and entail fundamentally reworking how Americans use energy.

Next month, Pickens' company, Mesa Power, will begin buying land and ordering 2700 wind turbines that will eventually generate 4000 megawatts of electricity. This is the equivalent of building two commercial scale nuclear power plants and enough power for about 1 million homes.

"These are substantial," said Mr Pickens, speaking to students at Georgetown University yesterday. "They're big."

Mr Pickens knows a thing or two about big. He heads the BP Capital hedge fund with over $US4 billion under management, and earned about $US1 billion in 2006 making big bets on commodity and equity markets.

Though a long-time oil man, Pickens said he has embraced the call for cleaner energy sources that don't emit heat-trapping greenhouse gases.

"I'm an environmentalist - I can pass the saliva test," he said.

But Mr Pickens is not out to save the planet. He intends to make money.

Though Mr Pickens admits that wind power won't be as lucrative as oil deals, he still expects the Texas project to turn at least a 25 per cent return.

"When I go into these markets, I expect to make money on them," Mr Pickens said. "I don't expect to lose."

America is facing a looming power crunch, with electricity demand expected to grow 15 per cent in a decade. And while many states have rejected big coal-fired power projects on environmental concerns, they are offering a bounty of incentives to build renewable sources.

US crude futures at new records above $US115 a barrel means a bright future for renewable sources like wind and solar.

Mr Pickens' wind farm is part of his wider vision for replacing natural gas for power generation with wind and solar, and using the natural gas instead to power vehicles.

To picture Mr Pickens' energy strategy, imagine a compass.

Stretching from north to south from Saskatchewan to Texas would be thousands of wind turbines, which could take advantage of some of the best US wind production conditions.

On the east-west axis from Texas to California would be large arrays of solar generation, which could send electricity into growing Southern California cities like Los Angeles.

The end result would be to free up more clean-burning natural gas - primarily a power-generation fuel now - to power automobiles.

Major oil companies have embraced so-called natural gas liquids because they have spent billions of dollars building refineries and pipelines to turn crude oil into petrol, Mr Pickens said.

But shifting natural gas used in power generation to transportation needs could cut US crude oil imports by nearly 40 per cent, he said.


UPDATE:


T. Boone Pickens confirmed news reports Wednesday that falling energy prices have forced him to delay plans to build a massive wind farm in western Texas.
.
"Things have slowed down, but, no, the (turbine) order has not been canceled," the energy investor and former oil magnate said on CNBC. He said he still expects to take delivery of the project's 2,700 turbines in 2010, as originally planned, but that their installation might be "slowed down a little bit" until wind is more competitive economically.
.
The Associated Press also reported Wednesday that Pickens has decided to cut spending on his multimedia renewable-energy campaign to between $40 million and $50 million from an initial budget of $60 million, due to the falling price of oil.
.
"Patience is what we're practicing. We think it's going to get worse, and there will be better opportunities," Pickens said.

UNEP observes massive deforestation in Afghanistan



Hmmm

Wednesday, April 09, 2008

Climate change to impact beer: scientist


April 8, 2008 at 4:43 AM EDT
AP


The price of beer is likely to rise in coming decades because climate change will hamper the production of a key grain needed for the brew — especially in Australia, a scientist warned Tuesday.


Jim Salinger, a climate scientist at New Zealand's National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, said climate change likely will cause a decline in the production of malting barley in parts of New Zealand and Australia. Malting barley is a key ingredient of beer.


It will mean either there will be pubs without beer or the cost of beer will go up,” Mr. Salinger told the Institute of Brewing and Distilling convention.


Similar effects could be expected worldwide, but Mr. Salinger spoke only of the effects on Australia and New Zealand. He said climate change could cause a drop in beer production within 30 years, especially in parts of Australia, as dry areas become drier and water shortages worsen.


Barley growing parts of Western Australia, South Australia, Victoria and New South Wales would likely be harder hit than growing areas in New Zealand's South Island.


“It will provide a lot of challenges for the brewing industry,” even forcing breweries to look at new varieties of malt barley as a direct result of climate change, Mr. Salinger said.


New Zealand and Australian brewer Lion Nathan's corporate affairs director Liz Read said climate change already was forcing up the price of malted barley, sugar, aluminum and sugar.


Ms. Read said that in addition to climate change, barley growers are grappling with competition from other forms or land use, such as the dairy industry.


Thursday, April 03, 2008

Greenhouse cuts to cost $430billion

Brian Robins
April 4, 2008

MAKING the cuts to greenhouse emissions recommended by the nation's economic adviser on climate change would cost hundreds of billions of dollars and slash the size of Australia's economy by 4 per cent, modelling by the NSW Treasury shows.

The NSW Treasurer, Michael Costa, said it would cost $430 billion to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by up to 80 per cent as outlined by Ross Garnaut, and the sharp reductions proposed would impose a substantial cost on the economy. The Rudd Government has consistently said its target for 2050 is 60 per cent. The 80 per cent figure was predicated on other nations making similar cuts.

In a hard-hitting speech to a business audience last night, Mr Costa said that based on NSW Treasury modelling, the proposed sharp reduction in greenhouse gas emissions would wipe 4 per cent off the size of the Australian economy over the next 20 years.

This is significantly larger than the 1 per cent economic impact signalled by earlier reviews such as that by the British economist Sir Nicholas Stern.

Mr Costa did not say what the Treasury calculations were based upon - for example, what its estimate was for a carbon price.

He said it was essential the electricity industry be given carbon credits as part of any emission trading scheme, because of the economic impact of complying with cuts.

Canberra's response to the Garnaut report would not affect the NSW Government's electricity privatisation program, he said.

Mr Costa's response is the first by a state government to Professor Garnaut's paper a fortnight ago. It raises questions about the economy's ability to make the changes, as well as the fallout from overseas investors if Australia moved unilaterally to change policy without compensation.

The Federal Government will release its own modelling of the economic impact midyear. Mr Costa said that if Canberra accepts Professor Garnaut's recommendation not to compensate those affected adversely by carbon trading, it would damage the perception among global investors that Australia is a sovereign risk-free place to invest.

The Federal Government should be realistic in responding to the issue, Mr Costa said, adding that international investors would be looking at how it treats property rights of asset owners.
Mr Costa outlined two scenarios based on the modelling for the impact of Professor Garnaut's recommendations in cutting greenhouse gas emissions.

If the 80 per cent cut to greenhouse gas emissions signalled by Professor Garnaut by 2050 was to be achieved, it would cost the economy $430 billion by 2030. Australia has a $1.3 trillion economy at present. If they were to be cut 60 per cent, it would cost $280 billion.

The State Government is believed to have received advice that the power industry be reorganised into three units, two to be sold to private sector bidders, and the third sold to residents through a public share issue.

Its advice points to three strong bidders for the assets: TruEnergy, Origin Energy and AGL. Smaller groups such as Babcock & Brown might also bid.

http://www.smh.com.au/news/environment/greenhouse-gas-cuts-will-cost-430b/2008/04/03/1206851105550.html

Wednesday, April 02, 2008

Geosequestration demonstration plant opens in Victoria

Here is a story about the Otway Basin Project which is a demonstration geosequestration (carbon capture and storage) plant that has just opened in Victoria. 'Clean' coal would be the saviour of not only the coal industry but also many governments including the NSW and Australian Governments. The idea is to trap carbon dioxide below the ground in geological formations. However, there are safety concerns that carbon dioxide may escape out of these formations. The idea of 'burying the problem' may be attractive to many, but until the new risks of this approach are better understood and able to be managed, it is sensible to remain skeptical about claims that 'clean' coal technology will help solve climate change. After all, it was burning all that 'dirty' coal that helped get us all into this mess. The Greens claim this is a tiny demonstration plant and it will do little to prove the safety of the method. The minerals council and the chief executive of the project claim it is significant and will help demonstrate the safety of the technology. Anyway, here is some of the story.
.
CO2 plant 'a step towards' clean coal

April 2, 2008
AAP

The opening of Australia's first carbon capture and storage (CCS) demonstration plant in Victoria has been hailed as a major step toward making "clean coal" viable.

The Otway Basin Project in south-west Victoria will see up to 100,000 tonnes of carbon dioxide captured from natural gas injected 2km underground in a depleted gas reservoir.

During the two-year trial, CO2 will be compressed and transported to the basin near Nirranda, about 30km east of Warrnambool.

The project is part of research to learn if emissions can be successfully trapped in geological formations, as a way of curbing the greenhouse gases produced by fossil fuels.

The Otway project is being conducted by the Cooperative Research Centre for Greenhouse Gas Technologies - known as CO2CRC - using $40 million in funding from federal and state governments, research organisations and industry.

"Using an innovative geotechnical monitoring program, the CO2CRC Otway project plays an important role in demonstrating the safety of geosequestration technology to communities, industry and governments worldwide," CO2CRC chief executive Peter Cook said.

"(It) has a very important role to play in demonstrating the technical and environmental feasibility of geosequestration to Australia and the world, and preparing the way for its widespread application," Mr Cook said.

The Australian Greens said the project is tiny in comparison to similar efforts overseas and would do little to improve understanding of carbon capture and storage.

Greens energy spokeswoman Christine Milne said it would not prove if carbon can be effectively and affordably captured at coal-fired power stations.

"The Otways project is government-funded PR for the coal sector and would be a perfect place to start for a government looking to find budget cuts," Senator Milne said.
.
"There simply cannot be a global solution to managing climate change without a clean-coal strategy as part of a suite of policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, in an international response to managing climate change," Minerals Council of Australia chief executive Mitch Hooke said.

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Wilkins Ice Shelf disintegrating


The collapse of a substantial section of the Wilkins Ice shelf was triggered February 28 when an iceberg measuring 41 by 2.4 kilometers (25.5 by 1.5 miles) broke off its southwestern front.

Sunday, March 23, 2008

Should coal-fired energy producers pay for greenhouse pollution permits???

Compo call for coal-fired energy producers

Adam Morton
March 22, 2008
The Age

AUSTRALIA'S coal-fired energy industry has won the backing of business and the NSW Government in its campaign for massive compensation under Kevin Rudd's proposed laws to slash greenhouse gas emissions.

A heated debate is raging between the electricity generation industry and Government climate change adviser Ross Garnaut, after he argued high-polluting power stations did not deserve a handout to ensure they survived.

Under the professor's proposed carbon trading scheme, the Government would cap emissions and force all non-trade exposed industries, including the dirtiest power producers, to buy greenhouse pollution permits at auction.

The Victorian Employers' Chamber of Commerce and Industry said yesterday that the state's brown-coal reliant power stations should be compensated to "smooth the adjustment burden" of the new scheme.

Its chief economist, Steven Wojtkiw, supported many of Professor Garnaut's suggestions — including helping poor households hit by soaring electricity prices and developing "clean coal" technology — but said it was unclear whether power stations would keep operating without help.

The Victorian Government, which has supported compensation through a states-backed emissions taskforce, indicated it would consider Professor Garnaut's position.

But the NSW Government, facing the prospect of the value of its state-owned electricity industry tumbling while it is trying to privatise it, warned that the national electricity market would be destroyed if no compensation was offered. NSW Treasurer Michael Costa said power station owners had property rights that must be recognised. Federal Opposition sources said it was likely the Liberal Party would back Professor Garnaut's call to not directly compensate power generators.

Professor Garnaut says it is inevitable that household electricity bills will rise, and there is no proof that giving power generators free permits will keep them down. Carbon trading is due to start in 2010.

http://www.garnautreview.org.au

http://www.theage.com.au/news/environment/compo-call-for-coalfired-energy-producers/2008/03/21/1205602661781.html


Random Man says "dirty coal should pay for permits !!!!!"

Wednesday, March 12, 2008

Save Blinky from Extinction


A new campaign to SAVE BLINKY from EXTINCTION has been launched by the Springfield Greenies.

Climate change threatens BLINKY, so if you want to help:
Please reduce your carbon emissions.

You can do this by:
  • eating less meat
  • driving less (e.g. walk for short trips or ride your bike on short to mid-range journeys)
  • reduce unnecessary consumption (e.g. do you really NEED those new shoes or do you just WANT them?)
  • recycling, repairing and reusing things

Comments are most welcome !!

If you enjoyed this post, please check out:
.
Saving the Supurb Parrot
.
Gorilla Slaughter
.
Poor Turtle
.
Penguin Protest
.
Remembering Arne Naess (1912-2009)

Monday, March 10, 2008

The Springfield Greenies


The Springfield Greenines are currently looking into the nuclear power issue to see whether it should be back in fashion in Australia.
.
My first guess is NO! But we will be back with more once we have had a look at the issues and stakeholders involved.
.
Why does the nuclear industry only see the 'good' of nuclear energy?
.
We all know (thanks to the Yin-Yang) that nuclear energy also has a 'bad' side (or shadow).
.
1. There is the problem of nuclear waste (much of which has a half-life of 4.6 billion years - which is a very long time!)
2. the problem of nuclear weapons and
3. the argument that nuclear energy is the answer to Global Warming is full of holes.
.
The Springfield Greenies will get back to you on this topic soon.
.
Comments welcome!

Great Videos !!




Wednesday, February 27, 2008

AUS and NZ to join forces on climate change

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd says the governments of Australia and New Zealand have decided to form a new partnership to work on the challenges of climate change.

New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark has met Mr Rudd and senior members of Federal Cabinet in Canberra today.

Mr Rudd says while the two countries have always worked well together in the past, he hopes the relationship can be strengthed in the future.

"We have an unprecedented opportunity to work closely and seamlessly, globally, in the international negotiations which will now take place between now and the end of the Bali roadmap which concludes at the Copenhagen conference at the end of 2009," he said.

Ms Clark says she is delighted by Australia's decision to ratify the Kyoto Protocol.

"It puts us on the same page and the work we must now do and the intense international diplomacy around reaching the post 2012 agreement," she said.

"It makes a huge difference to New Zealand to have Australia in and for us to be able to combine diplomatic effort and muscle in the international negotiations."

The two leaders also resolved to work more closely on promoting stability in the South Pacific.

http://www.abc.net.au/news/stories/2008/02/27/2174215.htm?section=australia

ps I love the some of the comments under this story.

Joshua...

"We have an unprecedented opportunity to work closely and seamlessly, globally, in the international negotiations which will now take place between now and the end of the Bali roadmap which concludes at the Copenhagen conference at the end of 2009," he said.

TRANSLATION -

We'll have a meeting, there'll be photos and maybe even biscuits afterwards.

and

Ford...

The blind leading the blind :P

Friday, February 22, 2008

Tasmanian premier to target forestry

By Matthew Denholm
February 23, 2008
The Australian

TASMANIAN Premier Paul Lennon has flagged potential reform of the forestry industry in response to climate change, vowing not to squib on recommendations of the Garnaut review.

Mr Lennon, a long-time champion of Tasmania's controversial timber industry, said yesterday the Garnaut climate change review held challenges for forestry.

He insisted he would act on the economist's recommendations, even if they were tough on forestry.

The Premier discussed the issue with Ross Garnaut after he handed down his interim report to state and territory leaders on Thursday.

Mr Lennon said Professor Garnaut would visit Tasmania as part of his deliberations.

"The people of Australia and the people of Tasmania want governments to act on the report - full stop," Mr Lennon said.

The Premier said the Gunns pulp mill proposed for northern Tasmania, which initially will be heavily reliant on native forests and is yet to secure a final wood supply agreement, was not immune from the Garnaut process.

Conservationists claim logging of native forests, even when they are replaced with regrowth forests, is a major source of greenhouse gases.

The Wilderness Society points to global research showing a permanent loss of 40 per cent to 60 per cent of carbon stored in old forests when they are logged, burned and regrown.

The industry claims forestry reduces greenhouse gas emissions. Timber Communities Australia claims Tasmania's production forests save 4.7 million tonnes of emissions each year, the equivalent of emissions from two million cars.

Mr Lennon said he hoped the final Garnaut report would cut through such "claim and counter-claim".

"Some people will say that the forest industry will provide a great bank of carbon sequestration; others will say that it's responsible for emissions," Mr Lennon told ABC Radio.

"Well, let's get the facts on the table from an independent person - without fear or favour."

The Premier said he made a specific request to Professor Garnaut on Thursday to assess forestry's climate change impact as part of his "leadership" on the issue.

Forestry was already part of Professor Garnaut's brief. It was covered in his "issues paper one", which has already elicited a number of submissions, including from the Lennon Government.

Opposition Leader Will Hodgman accused Mr Lennon of being a "fraud" who had "distorted the truth" to hide the fact that hehad spent years ignoring climate change.

Professor Garnaut's issues paper urges discussion on potential changes to farming and forestry, including in rotation periods.

The paper suggests forestry may benefit from increased biomass power generation and the use of forests as carbon offsets.

http://www.news.com.au/story/0,23599,23260372-421,00.html